Update: Romney willing to let Chinese global influence grow

Yesterday I noted the GOP presidential candidates did not seem to understand what U.S. foreign aid was all about.

One candidate — at the time I forgot who — said that instead of borrowing money from China and then providing aid to other countries, the U.S. should just tell the Chinese to send the money directly to those countries.

As I noted yesterday:

If that candidate who said “let the Chinese to do it” has his way, then he would be also handing over the developing world markets to Chinese businesses instead of American firms.

Thanks to one blogger who pays attention to such things — Josh Rogin at Foreign Policy — the Romney quote got prominent play but not deeper analysis. (Romney: Let’s let the Chinese feed the world’s hungry)

To be clear: U.S. foreign aid is more an investment in future democratic partners, markets and customers than just something we do because we are soft-hearted.

American foreign aid is designed to help the developing world build stronger economies, democratic institutions and secure civil societies.  There are real and substantial benefits to American policy and businesses. And it is through American assistance programs that these benefits are realized.

If the candidates who want to cut foreign aid and let “the Chinese to do it” have their way, then the U.S. would be cut out of the picture in the formation of the future of the world. Countries receiving massive amounts of aid from China would be more likely to pattern their political structures after that of Beijing. Chinese businesses — not American — would have an edge in the new and growing markets.

And U.S. political and economic interests will be cut out of the fastest growing sectors in the world.

Yep. that is a real sound policy.



Filed under China, International News Coverage

2 responses to “Update: Romney willing to let Chinese global influence grow

  1. China is already undercutting US efforts at aid. Example, the US offers an African country $15 million in aid in exchange for democratic reforms and other changes to the law. China comes in and offers the same amount of money for nothing aside from access to natural resources for state-owned enterprises. Who would those countries rather side with? Probably China, even though some are starting to wake up to the exploitation occurring. Politicians can’t justify Americans being poor and going hungry in their own country while at the same time feeding the same starving people in the same countries every year.

    • Kubiske

      But you know, the politicians COULD justify foreign aid if they would only look at it as an investment and then tried to talk to the American people in a serious way. (And boy oh boy are both parties at fault on this.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s