The Committee to Protect Journalists has a new report that is depressing.
Breaking the Cycle of Impunity in the Killing of Journalists looks at the how too many governments do little to seriously track down the murderers of journalists.
Of course, this failure also makes it nearly impossible to determine if the killing of a journalist was directly related to his/her profession or if there were other issues involved.
The demand for proof that a journalist was killed in the line of duty is one of the things I really like about how CPJ prepares its list of murdered journalists. Some organizations just list the names of journalists killed. They leave the assumption that they were killed because of their profession. But there is no way this can ever be verified.
The weak political and legal systems in the countries where this issues is the greatest are what need to be addressed along with the name and shame campaign of impunity. Perhaps a major step forward in finding the murderers of journalists (and human rights lawyers and taxi drivers and reform politicians) is finding ways to help those governments who want to improve and strengthen their legal systems, instead of cutting off aid and support.
The Chinese government is pulling out all the stops to make sure the official party line on the Tiananmen Square killings is the only one heard in China.
Besides the usual heavy-handed directives from Beijing to all media outlets on what to say and what not to say, the government has also moved against the Internet community in China, known as Netizens.
So, of course, anyone making any comments that challenge the official line gets in trouble: Professor’s Microblog Axed After Tiananmen Comment
For many, it is difficult remembering how things were 25 years ago. China Digital Times is running a series of articles and observations from that turbulent period in modern Chinese history
And while the rest of the world will be looking back at what happened then, the government leaders will just keep on doing “business as usual” rather than deal with the wound created 25 years ago.
And I should add that the ONLY place under Beijing rule that is allowed to openly discuss what happened at Tiananmen Square and is able to have demonstrations calling for a full investigation into what happened is Hong Kong.
And here is the famous “Tank Man” who stood up to the Chinese tanks heading to the square.
It’s that time again and Beijing has repeated the order Louie gave to his underlings at the Casablanca airport: “Round up the usual suspects.”
Activist arrested for planning Tiananmen hunger strike
Two prominent activists in the eastern city of Hangzhou have been taken into police custody since Friday for attempting to draw attention to the military crackdown on June 4, 1989 during which more than 200 protesters are believed to have died.
Each year the security police round up anyone who has called for an accounting of the government’s action in Tiananmen Square in 1989.
I watched it in action during my time in Shanghai (1992-1994). Our phone lines suddenly had more static and some lines, like those for Western reporters, temporarily “had difficulties.” Extra “security” put in front of the Western consulates and housing enclaves of Western diplomats and businessmen.
Editors and reporters regularly get transferred to other positions to make sure they do not have the opportunity to print or air anything that might call into question the government’s official line that is basically: “Nothing of interest happened in the Tiananmen Square area June 4.”
Things have not changed since then.
And thanks to China Digital Times for pointing the latest outrage.
Politics has always been a bare-knuckles and elbows blood sport, but the blood now seems to be from freedom of expression in Turkey.
Reuters: Turkey’s Erdogan threatens Twitter ban as vote looms
Al Jazeera: Turkey’s Erdogan threatens to ban Twitter
Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan threat to shut down Twitter and other social media platforms came after audio recordings were posted on social media exposing corruption in his inner circle.
Even as Erdogan railed against social media, he added that he did not care about the international response.
Recently Turkey has tightened control of the Internet under the guise of “protecting privacy.”
Freedom House ranks Turkey’s Internet as “Partly Free” in a report that states:
- Turkish authorities added several thousand websites to its blocking list, increasing the total to almost 30,000.
- Ruling in favor of a Turkish user, the European Court of Human Rights found Turkey in violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights for blocking access to the hosting platform Google Sites
Once again Al Jazeera has a great piece on an issue that is not getting a lot of coverage in the U.S. media.
In this case the issue is press freedom in the West Bank and Gaza. Seems the Palestinian Authority and Hamas are engaged in numerous violations of press freedom and harassment and arrests of Palestinian journalists. The charges against the journalists from each government is pretty much the same: The reporters where asking questions.
Palestinian journalists decry intimidation
The PA and Hamas have committed at least 500 documented press violations since 2007, including arrests, detention, torture, physical violence and censorship, according to the Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms (MADA).
Journalists are consequently forced to work in a political climate that has increasingly “led to the promotion of self-censorship among journalists, and media outlets”, the MADA press release observed.
Rest of story
What Hamas and the PA apparently have not yet figured out is that for there to be a democratic and independent Palestinian state, there has to be free and independent media.
Truong Duy Nhat, 50, was found to have “abused his freedoms to infringe upon the state’s interest” in posts on his blog, the last of which was in May last year, when he criticized the procedure for Vietnam first-ever parliamentary censure motion.
Vietnam jails ex-journalist over anti-government blog
News is spreading about the latest round of pressure being exerted on Hong Kong journalists to kowtow to the local and national governments.
The interview linked below with leading Hong Kong journalists is from Radio Australia.
Hong Kong journalists resist free media constraints
- Kevin LAU: Violence is meant to intimidate. If we are frightened into submission we will lose our freedom. We journalists must stand fearless, we must insist that justice be served, we must strive to tell the truth without fear or favour. Freedom is not a given, freedom is not free, we all have to earn and guard it.
- Willy LAM: I think the central government as well as the current administration are putting pressure on the Hong Kong media to toe the line from Beijing, not to report news which is considered to be embarrassing to the Chinese administration, and also to refrain from advocating a faster pace of democracy in Hong Kong
- Shirley YAM: There’s certain so-called liberal commentators they were barred from appearing in certain newspapers. Story ideas were banned, headlines were changed and photos were added, columnists were sacked, this is the kind of reality we are facing, and we are worried that it’s going to get worse.